Proven Pay Problems?
These documents from court records show dramatic pay-changes where Mr Noack's pay was really slammed! The series shows he apparently was running some afterschool sites. Suddenly, he got hit with a massive pay-cut for a few months (on one of his "Task" lines). It was during the summer, so school was not going on, was it? That would seem to show he was forced from his office job to go work day camp at a greatly reduced payrate. Why? Did all of his coworkers in the office suffer the same fate? If not, why only Mr. Noack, and why sack his pay?
Look, his work evaluations (shown on another page) indicate he was a great employee - seems to be a real nice person! Is this proof that something horrible was going on secretly behind the scenes? If he did do anything so wrong as to merit it, why would they restore his pay only a few months later? Ask anyone - is it normal to casually smash someone's pay when they have bills to pay? This is all in court records, so the judges knew about it - it was introduced as evidence. That means some kind of corruption in my opinion.
Additionally, Noack's labor testimony indicates unpaid overtime, and not just on himself. The YMCA "internal investigation" admitted incorrect timekeeping, so that adds veracity to Noack's testimony. However, in that document, his female YMCA coworkers all seemed to say it never happened to themselves. Since the YMCA apparently acknowledge it happened to Noack & paid him for years of unpaid OT by quickly shuttling $$ into his account via direct-deposit when he resigned & he was the only man in the office when he left, doesn't that prove it was discrimination?
Also, since it included years of ongoing behavior, wouldn't that be ongoing discrimination? Yet, the courts ignored that, although the evidence was from both sides! Room for more documents would be nice, but too much more & it might seem overwhelming.
American workers should demand an investigation into the whole thing: judicial corruption, retaliation, oppression of workers' rights, discrimination, & judge's ignoring the evidence as well as proof of purjury by the employer. Yep, Mr. Noack evidently proved YMCA perjury and also their lying to labor officials, plus he claims there was evidence-tampering upon appeal. To the average Joe, this all now easily looks like collusion behind the scenes involving various parties (& maybe judges). I'd say impeach any crooked judges and start sending people to jail. That's how you end this kind of mess so it stops fouling our legal system and how we restore public confidence in our courts.
With this much evidence, there absolutely must be an investigation. People across America want to know they can have at least some sort of stability and protection at work. Where are the politicians on this? Where's Obama? He can order an FBI investigation! YMCA employees need to unionize to protect themselves. Minorities suffering economically might also demand action. The YMCA should have made amends with the poor man: now look what has happened! Oh, what a "tangled web" is weaved. Blacks nation-wide may call for the proverbial "heads on a platter" on this case. The evidence seems to show blatant corruption involved in driving the poor Mr. Noack out of court without allowing him a jury trial, and pro-Constitution advocates could, likewise! Could this unite Americans from both sides of the aisle on violations of personal liberties?
(The right to a jury trial is guaranteed by the 7th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution in cases of $20 value or greater).
(See http://www.law.cornell.edu/anncon/html/amdt7frag1_user.html .)
Look, his work evaluations (shown on another page) indicate he was a great employee - seems to be a real nice person! Is this proof that something horrible was going on secretly behind the scenes? If he did do anything so wrong as to merit it, why would they restore his pay only a few months later? Ask anyone - is it normal to casually smash someone's pay when they have bills to pay? This is all in court records, so the judges knew about it - it was introduced as evidence. That means some kind of corruption in my opinion.
Additionally, Noack's labor testimony indicates unpaid overtime, and not just on himself. The YMCA "internal investigation" admitted incorrect timekeeping, so that adds veracity to Noack's testimony. However, in that document, his female YMCA coworkers all seemed to say it never happened to themselves. Since the YMCA apparently acknowledge it happened to Noack & paid him for years of unpaid OT by quickly shuttling $$ into his account via direct-deposit when he resigned & he was the only man in the office when he left, doesn't that prove it was discrimination?
Also, since it included years of ongoing behavior, wouldn't that be ongoing discrimination? Yet, the courts ignored that, although the evidence was from both sides! Room for more documents would be nice, but too much more & it might seem overwhelming.
American workers should demand an investigation into the whole thing: judicial corruption, retaliation, oppression of workers' rights, discrimination, & judge's ignoring the evidence as well as proof of purjury by the employer. Yep, Mr. Noack evidently proved YMCA perjury and also their lying to labor officials, plus he claims there was evidence-tampering upon appeal. To the average Joe, this all now easily looks like collusion behind the scenes involving various parties (& maybe judges). I'd say impeach any crooked judges and start sending people to jail. That's how you end this kind of mess so it stops fouling our legal system and how we restore public confidence in our courts.
With this much evidence, there absolutely must be an investigation. People across America want to know they can have at least some sort of stability and protection at work. Where are the politicians on this? Where's Obama? He can order an FBI investigation! YMCA employees need to unionize to protect themselves. Minorities suffering economically might also demand action. The YMCA should have made amends with the poor man: now look what has happened! Oh, what a "tangled web" is weaved. Blacks nation-wide may call for the proverbial "heads on a platter" on this case. The evidence seems to show blatant corruption involved in driving the poor Mr. Noack out of court without allowing him a jury trial, and pro-Constitution advocates could, likewise! Could this unite Americans from both sides of the aisle on violations of personal liberties?
(The right to a jury trial is guaranteed by the 7th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution in cases of $20 value or greater).
(See http://www.law.cornell.edu/anncon/html/amdt7frag1_user.html .)